Recently,
Lu Qinan, Assistant Professor of the School of Agricultural Economics and Rural
Development, Renmin University of China (RUC) published an article entitled
"Ozone stress and crop harvesting failure: Evidence from US food
production" in the academic journal Food Policy.
The
study is joint research of Liu Ziheng, a doctoral student at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison, and Lu Qinan, an assistant professor at RUC, who is the sole
corresponding author of the study. The study analyzed the effects of
near-surface ozone on crop abandonment behaviors.
It
is noted that Assistant Prof. Lu Qinan still has several papers on assessing
the impact of climate change and air pollution on the agricultural fields under
review by top-notch academic journals in the field.
Global exposure to surface-level ozone
pollution has increased over the past century. The decision to abandon crops is
a crucial behavioral response when facing environmental stresses. Growers
abandon crops to minimize losses when the revenues of collecting crops are
expected to be lower than the costs of harvesting crops. Based on a dataset
constructed from USDA Quick Stats and satellite based aerosol optical depth
(AOD) retrievals over the time interval 2003–2021, this study measures the
responses of the corn and soybean harvested ratios, the ratios of harvested
acres to planted acres, to ozone stress. This dataset contains information on
the harvested ratios of corn and soybeans as well as pollutant concentrations
and weather conditions over the growing seasons for each county in each year. This
study aims to provide the first empirical evidence of the impact of ozone
pollution on the decision to abandon crops.
This study find evidence that a
one-standard-deviation rise in ozone concentration decreases the harvested
ratios of corn and soybeans by 0.133 and 0.151 standard deviations,
respectively. We interpret these estimates of harvested ratios as ozone-induced
crop abandonment and show that the production benefits from ozone control would
be considerably underestimated without considering the adjustments in crop
abandonment. Our bootstrap simulation
results suggest that without accounting for the saved acreage that should have
been abandoned, the production benefits from a one-standard-deviation decrease
in ozone concentrations will be underestimated by 49.561 % for corn and 32.479
% for soybeans, which are equivalent to 2.133 billion USD and 0.494 billion USD
in monetary terms.
The study also further
investigates the heterogeneous effects of ambient ozone on the decision to
abandon crops with respect to various insurance enrollment rates and received
crop prices. We find evidence that a higher insurance enrollment rate aggravates
the reduction in both corn and soybean harvested ratios induced by ozone
pollution. This adaptation disincentive induced by insurance suggests that
policymakers may mitigate the unexpected behavioral distortions by refining
insurance design. Contrary to the consistent effects of insurance on both corn
and soybeans, the price effects vary. While a higher received price mitigates
the reduction in the soybean harvested ratio caused by ozone, its impact on the
ozone-induced reduction in the corn harvested ratio is in the opposite
direction, and such a discrepancy may be explained by the option to harvest
corn grain early as silage.
About the journal:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal
publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation,
implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing,
transition, and advanced economies.
The journey is an SSCI and SCI journal
published by Elsevier Publishing Group. It is a top academic journal that
focuses on high-level research results in food economy and food policy. The
journal has an impact factor of 6.08 and is a JCR 1 journal, which is always
one of the journals with the highest impact factor in the field of agricultural
economics. Food Policy, together with American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, Agricultural Economics and Journal of Agricultural Economics, are
considered as the four most authoritative international journals in the field
of agricultural economics.